From a first glance at this paper I am intrigued by (1) arguments that this is consistent qm gravitationally viz. corrections (right column page 3) (2) one of the last remarks in this paper: "The only requirement for a large number of vacua is that the leading instanton charges do not form a primitive basis for the integer lattice."
Inflation and dark energy from f(R) gravity
ReplyDeleteMichal Artymowski, Zygmunt Lalak, Marek Lewicki
arXiv:1510.04864v1
Conservation of \zeta with radiative corrections from heavy field
ReplyDeleteTakahiro Tanaka, Yuko Urakawa
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.05059.pdf
Radiative plateau inflation
ReplyDeleteGuillermo Ballesteros, Carlos Tamarit
http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05669
Greetings from Florence :)
ReplyDeleteAxionic Band Structure of the Cosmological Constant
ReplyDeleteThomas C. Bachlechner
http://xxx.uni-augsburg.de/abs/1510.06388
greetings from Leuven!
DeleteFrom a first glance at this paper I am intrigued by
(1) arguments that this is consistent qm gravitationally viz. corrections (right column page 3)
(2) one of the last remarks in this paper: "The only requirement for a large number of vacua is that the leading instanton charges do not form a primitive basis for the integer lattice."
Is all of this consistent with the WGC etc.?